By Tony Keen - Roar Rookie[?]
February 26th 2007 @ 12:27pm
Get a Roar profile


ADVERTISEMENT
View The Roar's top cricket writers.

Cup the perfect stage for Watson

Ever since making his international debut in 2002, Shane Watson has been touted as the next big thing in Australian cricket.

Fast-forward five years and the bustling Queenslander has managed three Test caps and 57 one-day appearances in a career which has thus far been blighted by injury and has failed to live up to the hype.

The 25-year-old has averaged just over 32 with the ball and 30.87 with the bat in the one-day arena.

In the wake of the debacle that was the Chappell-Hadlee series for Australia, Watson has come in for some stinging criticism from former Australian coach Bob Simpson.

Simpson, who was a driving force behind Australia’s first World Cup victory in 1987, questioned whether Watson had “the skills or flexibility to cope with cricket at the highest level.”

Watson, who was a surprise selection for the Commonwealth Bank Trophy finals series against England after missing the Ashes series with a right hamstring strain, has struggled upon his return.

In the five games since the first final in Melbourne, Watson has managed 122 runs at an average of 30.50 and taken six wickets at 45.16.

In the recent 3-0 loss to New Zealand Watson returned 76 runs at 38 and five wickets at 34.8

Hardly impressive figures, which has led a number of experts to question the reasoning behind the Queenslander’s selection in the 15-man squad to tour the Caribbean.

However, things need to be put into context.

Fellow all-rounder and Queensland teammate Andrew Symonds mixture of medium-pace and off spin will be missing for at least the early matches as he faces a race against time to recover from a ruptured bicep which sidelined him for the finals against England.

Australia’s next best all-round option Cameron White averages a meagre 22.42 with the bat and 50.25 with the ball, firebrand Brett Lee is sidelined with an ankle injury and veteran Glenn McGrath is struggling for form, having taken four wickets at 55.25 in his last four outings.

The Aussie selectors were left with no option than to include Watson in the squad.

While his return to the international stage has been less than impressive, Simpson’s criticism is unjustified given the amount of cricket the Tasmanian product has missed.

In the time between injuring his right hamstring on the eve of the first Ashes Test at the Gabba and the first one day final in Melbourne, Watson had played only a handful of matches for his state.

His selection in the one-day finals series against England came as a shock to most, however the talented but injury plagued Queenslander was in dire need of match practice on an international stage.

It was better for the Australian selectors to throw Watson into the fray and get some games under his belt, rather than risk him at the World Cup with no overs under his belt against world-class batsmen.

Australia’s batting stocks aren’t the issue of concern, having scored over 300 runs in the final two matches of the Chappell-Hadlee series.

However, a lack of bowling depth left the Aussies found wanting as New Zealand completed the second and third largest run chases in history.

To blame Australia’s recent run of poor form which has resulted in them losing their mantle as the number one side in one-day cricket to South Africa on Watson is short-sighted and fails to take into account all the facts.

Australia managed to take only 13 wickets in the three matches against New Zealand, of which Watson, who was leading wicketaker for the tourists, took five.

The fact that Watson took more than a third of Australia’s wickets and scored an impressive 68 in a 122-run opening stand with Matthew Hayden illustrates that with an injury free run Watson is capable of delivering on his potential.

There is no questioning Watson’s talent as an all-rounder.

It was on full display in the Champions Trophy tournament in 2006 where the Queenslander made two half centuries and nabbed eight wickets, including an impressive 57 not out and two-for 11 in the final against the West Indies.

The major concern however has always been Watson’s ability to stay on the park; however these past five matches and the three-lead up matches in the Caribbean in the lead-up to the start of the World Cup should provide Watson with the confidence and fitness to be a key player in Australia’s cup campaign.

With Australia in the midst of a five-game losing streak and minus one of their strike weapons in Lee, the stage is set for Watson to repay the faith shown in him by the selectors since 2002 and turn his glimpses of talent into consistent performances and help guide Australia to their third straight World Cup.

Like this content? Buzz it up!

Free Email updates:

Our daily emails are only sent if there is content for the sport or that author. You can subscribe to multiple daily emails; or get the daily Roar email with all our content in it. We value privacy. More...

 

Crowd Says (5)

  •   Boo Cheers

    Rosso said  | February 26th 2007 @ 2:24pm | Report comment

    Watson does not deserve to be in the team. Let’s look at his bowling in the last few games. 2-88 in Game 3, 3-58 in Gm2, 0-28 off 4 in Game 1.Average 7.25 rpo. He gave up vital 4’s to Collingwood in Final # 1 of the CBA series. Someone should tell him not to bowl half volleys at the end of an innings. Hilfy and S.Clark are much better bowlers. So if we agree he cannot and should not bowl, are there better batsman in the country than him ? Absolutely. Then why is he being picked ???

  •   Boo Cheers

    Nihal said  | February 26th 2007 @ 4:44pm | Report comment

    Wheres hilfenhaus and stuart clark? atleast they can move the ball.

    have

    hilfenhaus
    clark
    tait
    Macgill

    as the 4 specialist bowlers. Every team going to the world cup has a specialist spinner than can TURN the ball – key word is turn.

  •   Boo Cheers

    GRANT KULL said  | February 27th 2007 @ 12:05pm | Report comment

    What did andy bichel ever do wrong

  •   Boo Cheers

    Will said  | February 28th 2007 @ 7:51pm | Report comment

    I’m sorry…but he is a dud.

  •   Boo Cheers

    Rosso said  | March 1st 2007 @ 12:29pm | Report comment

    I agree Grant, Andy Bichel would still be better than Watson. Bichel got dropped after the World Cup, even though they would have been eliminated if they got beat by England. Bich and Bevo put on a big partnership to win the game when the top order failed. You may remember Bich also took 7 wkts that game. Ponting and Buck have always had favourites which is why we had to regain the Ashes instead of regaining them. The 05′ Ashes was a classic example when Hussey & MacGill didn’t get a game. Now we have Clark getting dropped for Tait and Hilfy not getting a game when he did well in his limited appearances, certainly better than Watson has done in the last 5 games. He must bowl really well in the nets or tell great jokes in the dressing room.

Have your Say

If you like this article, Subscribe! Subscribe to our daily email

Please be sure to enter your name and email before submitting this comment. Please also refer to our comments policy

 

Hot debate

What you're Roaring!

By signing up to the daily The Roar email you'll receive all the new articles and sports opinion that we put up on the website each day - delivered direct into your inbox. For free. We think it's the best way to receive our content.

Our emails contain the article along with the images - just like on the website.